No cause is righteous if it forgets the smallest and most vulnerable among us. In every generation, there comes a time when we must draw a firm lin
No cause is righteous if it forgets the smallest and most vulnerable among us.
In every generation, there comes a time when we must draw a firm line.
This is one of those times.
Because there are people—smart, well-educated, well-positioned people—who are inching closer and closer to justifying the unthinkable.
They ask questions like:
“What if a child is curious?”
“What if the adult didn’t mean harm?”
“What if we reimagine relationships differently?”
“What if it’s cultural?”
“What if preventing harm is actually censorship?”
And before we know it, we’ve slipped into something dangerous:
A world where protecting children becomes optional.
Where their safety is weighed against someone else’s identity, desire, or politics.
We’re here to say—absolutely not.
🚫 This is the line. And we do not cross it.
We do not cross it for art.
We do not cross it for academia.
We do not cross it for activism.
We do not cross it for entertainment.
We do not cross it for tradition, faith, or ideology.
We do not cross it for someone’s “liberation journey.”
If your movement, message, or belief system leaves children exposed, afraid, or exploited—
it is not progress.
It is not justice.
It is not love.
It is simply a new costume for the oldest cruelty on Earth.
🔥 We do not debate the value of protecting children.
We do not entertain gray areas about abuse.
We do not hand over our children to be the price paid for someone else’s unhealed wounds.
We do not shrink, silence, or second-guess ourselves when it comes to their safety.
Because Protecting Children Is Not Optional—It’s the Line We Do Not Cross.
And anyone asking us to soften that line, erase that line, or move that line…
is telling you who they are.