📚 Supreme Court Case: What Parents Need to Know About Opting Out of Gender Curriculum

Photo by Daniel K Cheung/Unsplash

A major case is currently being heard by the U.S. Supreme Court that could impact your rights as a parent—especially when it comes to what your child is taught in school about gender and sexuality. A group of parents from various religious backgrounds, including Muslim, Catholic, and Ukrainian Orthodox faiths, filed a lawsuit arguing that the mandatory inclusion of these books without an opt-out option infringes upon their First Amendment rights to freely exercise their religion. They contend that the content conflicts with their religious teachings and that they should have the ability to guide their children’s exposure to such topics.

Here’s what you need to know in simple terms:

1. What’s the Case About?

Parents in Montgomery County, Maryland sued the public school district because they were no longer allowed to opt their children out of certain storybook lessons that include themes of gender identity and sexuality—even when the content went against their religious or moral beliefs.

2. What Changed in Schools?

The school district had once allowed parents to say “no thank you” to some of the LGBTQ+-themed books. But in 2023, they took away that option, saying it made things harder to manage and could hurt the feelings of some students.

3. Which Books Were Included?

Some books were gentle and age-appropriate:

• 🧑🏽‍🤝‍🧑🏽 Uncle Bobby’s Wedding – about a same-sex wedding, written in a positive and friendly way.

But others made many parents uncomfortable and seemed too mature for young children. Examples include:

• 👑 Prince & Knight – romantic and heroic, but raised concerns about introducing romance and gender themes too early.

• 🐶 Pride Puppy: A Closer Look

  One of the books at the center of this controversy is Pride Puppy, an alphabet book designed for pre-kindergarten and kindergarten students. The story follows a family attending a Pride parade, during which their puppy gets lost. As readers follow the puppy’s adventure, they’re introduced to various elements associated with Pride events.Education Week+9Religious Freedom Institute+9Maclean’s+9Maclean’s+1SCOTUSblog+1

  While the book aims to celebrate diversity and inclusion, some parents have raised concerns about certain illustrations and vocabulary. Specifically, the book includes a “search-and-find” feature where children are prompted to identify items such as “leather,” “lip ring,” “underwear,” and “drag kings and queens” amidst the parade scenes. Critics argue that these elements may not be age-appropriate for young children and could introduce complex topics prematurely .The Washington Post+2Maryland Matters+2Education Week+2

  In response to these concerns and as part of the ongoing legal discussions, Montgomery County Public Schools decided in February 2024 to remove Pride Puppy from the mandatory curriculum. However, the book remains available in school libraries for those who wish to access it .FOX 5 DC+13Religious Freedom Institute+13The Washington Post+13The Washington Post

• 🧠 Other books used complex and adult-like language about gender fluidity, transitioning, and personal identity—topics that many felt were not suitable for young children.

4. What Are Parents Asking For?

Parents are asking for the right to opt their children out of these lessons. They say:

• Their religious and cultural values are being disrespected.

• They deserve to choose when and how their child learns about sensitive topics.

• They are not trying to hate or harm anyone—they just want the freedom to parent.

5. What Did the Judges Say?

Some judges, including Justice Alito, expressed concern. He said some of the books clearly teach a moral lesson, and not all families agree with that message.

🧑🏾⚖️ What Did Justice Jackson Say?

During the case about whether parents can opt their children out of gender and sexuality lessons in school, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson raised some thoughtful questions and concerns:

1. How far would this go?
   She asked: If parents can opt out of books, could they also ask for their child not to be in a classroom with a gay teacher?
   She was worried about how big the rule could get and what it might lead to.

2. Who decides what’s okay in schools?
   Justice Jackson said judges shouldn’t be the ones deciding which books are “okay” or “not okay” for classrooms.
   She believes that’s a job for schools and local communities—not the courts.

3. This case is still early
   She reminded everyone that the parents in this case weren’t asking to remove books, just to bring back the option to say “no thank you” to certain lessons. She warned the Court not to make a decision that would affect every school in the country without fully understanding all the effects.

4. She’s concerned about big changes
   Justice Jackson is worried that if the Court makes a big ruling, it could take power away from teachers, school leaders, and local families—and give too much control to the courts.

🧑🏻⚖️ What Did Justice Gorsuch Say?

During the court hearing, Justice Neil Gorsuch had serious questions about whether Pride Puppy! was appropriate for very young children, like those in pre-K and kindergarten.

1. He asked about the words in the book
   Justice Gorsuch asked the school’s lawyer if the book had words like:

   • “Leather”

   • “Bondage”

   • “Sex workers”

2. The lawyer explained
   The lawyer said:

   • No, the book does not talk about bondage or sex workers.

   • The word “leather” was just about a woman wearing a leather jacket.

   • The book does include words like “drag queen” as part of an alphabet list.

3. Why this matters
   Justice Gorsuch’s questions show that he’s concerned about young kids being introduced to adult-sounding topics—even if it’s just in a picture book with an alphabet theme.

4. About the book
   Pride Puppy! tells the story of a family going to a Pride parade, where they lose their puppy and look for it. Along the way, kids are introduced to a lot of new words.
   But some people—including some parents and judges—feel the book might include too many topics that small children aren’t ready for.

6. Why Does This Matter to You?

Because if the court rules against the parents, it could:

• Make it harder to know what your child is being taught.

• Take away your power to protect your child from content that doesn’t match your values or their readiness.

• Set a national precedent that could affect all public schools.

7. What Happens Next?

The Supreme Court will make its decision by late June or early July 2025. This decision could shape how much say parents have in their child’s education—for years to come.

💡 What Can You Do Now?

• Talk to your children about what they’re learning.

• Ask your school district if opt-outs are available.

• Follow this case: Mahmoud v. Taylor.

• Join with other parents to advocate for your family’s voice to be respected.

Whatever the decision……🗣️ “Parents are not optional. Our values and our voices matter.”
– RosasChildren.com